Published September 12, 2026. Last updated September 12, 2026.
The voice that tells you the mistake in the meeting is who you actually are, or that everyone else has this figured out except you, feels like a private flaw. Decades of research treat it as a documented, measurable pattern with its own literature. It shows up as harsh self-talk, as the sense that your best effort still doesn’t count, as a nagging feeling you don’t measure up to what you’re supposed to be. This page gathers the negative self-talk statistics that hold up: what self-talk research actually measures, what the perfectionism cohort studies track, where the 9-to-82-percent imposter syndrome range comes from, and what the self-esteem data shows, every number dated and linked to its source.
Key takeaways
- In a 2015 experience-sampling study of 35 adults tracked across five days (fieldwork predates the December 2014 manuscript), self-critical self-talk occurred in about 72 percent of the situations designed to elicit it, against 51 percent for self-reinforcing self-talk in matched situations (Brinthaupt, Benson, Kang, & Moore, 2015).
- Among 3,112 students surveyed at a midwestern U.S. university (fielding year unstated, no later than 2021), 20.1 percent classified as adaptive perfectionists, 35.7 percent as maladaptive, and 44.3 percent as nonperfectionists on the Almost Perfect Scale-Revised (Kawamoto et al., 2023).
- Among 10,217 Norwegian adolescents ages 16 to 19 surveyed in spring 2012, 10.2 percent of girls and 8.5 percent of boys scored above a 90th-percentile perfectionism threshold (Sand et al., 2021).
- Reported imposter syndrome prevalence spans 9 percent to 82 percent across 62 studies and 14,161 participants, literature searched January 1966 through May 2018, the spread driven by which screening tool and cutoff each study used (Bravata et al., 2020); see what percentage of people experience imposter syndrome.
- A U.S. normative sample of 503 adults (fieldwork date not stated; 2010 is the confirmed publication year) averaged 22.62 out of 30 on the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, above the scale’s own low-esteem cutoff of 15 (Sinclair et al., 2010); see how common is low self-esteem.
- Across 53 nations and 16,998 people, fieldwork dated no later than 2002, every national average self-esteem score landed above the Rosenberg scale’s theoretical midpoint (Schmitt & Allik, 2005).
- In the largest self-esteem dataset to date, close to 985,000 people ages 16 to 45 across 48 nations, collected 1999 to 2009, men reported higher self-esteem than women at every age studied (Bleidorn et al., 2016).
Cite this page
APA: Eduard, S. (2026, September 12). Negative self-talk statistics: Self-criticism, perfectionism, and imposter syndrome by the numbers. StumbleTowardTheLight. https://stumbletowardthelight.com/negative-self-talk-statistics/
MLA: Eduard, Sebastian. “Negative Self-Talk Statistics: Self-Criticism, Perfectionism, and Imposter Syndrome by the Numbers.” StumbleTowardTheLight, 12 Sept. 2026, stumbletowardthelight.com/negative-self-talk-statistics/.
The source table
| # | Statistic | Data collected | Source type | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Self-Talk Scale identifies four types (self-critical, self-reinforcing, self-managing, social-assessing), validated across 5 nonclinical adult samples | fielded prior to 2009 publication | primary study | Brinthaupt, Hein, & Kramer, 2009 |
| 2 | Self-critical self-talk correlated negatively with self-esteem; self-reinforcing self-talk correlated positively | same fielding as row 1 | primary study | Brinthaupt, Hein, & Kramer, 2009 |
| 3 | Self-critical self-talk occurred in about 72% of situations designed to elicit it (n=35); self-reinforcing self-talk occurred in 51% of matched situations | fieldwork predates December 2014 manuscript; published 2015 | primary study | Brinthaupt, Benson, Kang, & Moore, 2015 |
| 4 | 559 articles used the term “self-talk” between 1978 and 2020, sorted into six research categories | 1978-2020 literature window; review published 2023 | derived (literature review) | Latinjak et al., 2023 |
| 5 | Among 1,071 race participants in the Basque Country, higher perceived stress predicted more frequent negative self-talk, weaker among those scoring higher on emotional appraisal | fielded prior to 2023 online publication; print edition January 2024 | primary study | Borrajo, Calvete, & Urquijo, 2024 |
| 6 | Among 177 undergraduates (1,092 coded self-talk statements), dysfunctional self-talk predicted lower satisfaction and self-efficacy | fielded prior to 2023 publication | primary study | Uhrich et al., 2023 |
| 7 | No self-talk survey, and no “80% negative” figure, appears in APA’s press releases, publication index, or Stress in America reports across 19 annual cycles | 2007-2025 (survey series); checked directly 2026 | derived (absence verification) | APA, Stress in America archive |
| 8 | Socially prescribed perfectionism rose overall; 307 samples, 82,939 U.S., Canadian, and British college students; effect sizes not retrievable from the full text | 1989-2024 | primary study | Curran, Hill, & Pose, 2026 |
| 9 | Predicted socially prescribed score 3.35 (1989) to 3.71 (2017) on a 1-to-7 scale, a 0.40 SD gain, reported as a 32% increase; 164 samples, 41,641 students | 1989-2016 | primary study | Curran & Hill, 2019 |
| 10 | Perfectionism’s three dimensions, self-oriented, other-oriented, and socially prescribed, are the constructs most classification and cohort studies measure | defined 1991 | primary study (measure definition) | Hewitt & Flett, 1991 |
| 11 | Of 3,112 university students, 20.1% adaptive perfectionists, 35.7% maladaptive, 44.3% nonperfectionists on the Almost Perfect Scale-Revised | unstated in the paper; no later than 2021 | primary study | Kawamoto et al., 2023 |
| 12 | 55.7% of that same 3,112-student sample carried a perfectionist classification (624 adaptive + 1,110 maladaptive) | same as row 11 | derived (rows summed) | Kawamoto et al., 2023 |
| 13 | Adaptive perfectionists in that sample reported significantly greater self-compassion than maladaptive perfectionists | same as row 11 | primary study | Kawamoto et al., 2023 |
| 14 | 10.2% of girls and 8.5% of boys scored above a 90th-percentile perfectionism threshold; 10,217 Norwegian adolescents ages 16-19 | spring 2012 | primary study | Sand et al., 2021 |
| 15 | An APA-affiliate news release states a 33% rise in socially prescribed perfectionism; the paper’s own Results section states 32% | announced Jan 2, 2018; underlying data 1989-2016 | derived (circulation trace) | Curran & Hill, 2019 |
| 16 | No nationally representative adult survey located reports a perfectionism prevalence rate, in any country or year | 2026 (this page’s check) | derived (absence disclosed) | see rows 8, 9, 11, 14 |
| 17 | Reported imposter syndrome prevalence ranges 9% to 82% across 62 studies, 14,161 participants | searched Jan 1966-May 2018; published 2020 | primary study (review) | Bravata et al., 2020 |
| 18 | 654 Korean Catholic adults: 24% prevalence at a Clance cutoff of 62, 39% at a cutoff of 58, from the identical answers | not stated; published 1995 | primary study (via review) | Chae et al., 1995 |
| 19 | 459 first-year Vienna undergraduates: 9% scored in the “intense” imposter band, 46% “moderate” | not stated; published 2017 | primary study | Patzak et al., 2017 |
| 20 | 631 Austrian doctoral students: 82% registered at least low levels of imposter feelings, 33% moderate | not stated; published 2012 | primary study (via review) | Jöstl et al., 2012 |
| 21 | 48 Canadian internal medicine residents: 43.8% scored as impostors on the Clance Impostor Scale | not stated; published 2008 | primary study | Legassie et al., 2008 |
| 22 | Over 150 high-achieving women studied in individual therapy and interaction groups; no prevalence percentage reported | roughly 1973-1978 | primary study | Clance & Imes, 1978 |
| 23 | 16 of 62 reviewed studies found women’s imposter-syndrome rates significantly higher than men’s; 17 found no sex difference | searched Jan 1966-May 2018; published 2020 | primary study (review) | Bravata et al., 2020 |
| 24 | The circulated “70% of people experience imposter feelings” figure traces to a trade newspaper feature dating the underlying research to the mid-1980s and scoping it to careers. The figure does not describe a lifetime prevalence. | published Nov 9, 2007; research undated beyond “mid-1980s” | derived (circulation trace) | Gravois, 2007; Sakulku & Alexander, 2011 |
| 25 | 503 U.S. adults averaged 22.62 (of 30) on the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, above the scale’s low-esteem cutoff of 15 | only 2010 publication year confirmed | primary study | Sinclair et al., 2010 |
| 26 | Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale developed and validated on 5,024 high school juniors and seniors across 10 New York State schools | mid-1960s, ahead of 1965 publication | primary study | Rosenberg, 1965 |
| 27 | 16,998 people across 53 nations; every national average above the theoretical midpoint, grand mean 30.85 (of 40) | no later than 2002 | primary study | Schmitt & Allik, 2005 |
| 28 | Self-esteem tends to rise with age from adolescence into adulthood in nearly every country studied; roughly 985,000 people ages 16-45, 48 nations | 1999-2009 | primary study | Bleidorn et al., 2016 |
| 29 | Men reported higher self-esteem than women at every age studied, gap widest in wealthier individualistic nations, narrowest in nations such as Thailand, Indonesia, and India | 1999-2009 | primary study | Bleidorn et al., 2016 |
| 30 | No study, survey, or dataset naming a researcher, sample size, or year supports the “85% of people have low self-esteem” claim; its earliest identifiable source applies “85%” to confidence, happiness, and self-esteem alike | archived as early as December 2006 | derived (circulation trace) | Rubino, 2006 |
| 31 | No National Science Foundation study on the number or content of human thoughts exists anywhere in NSF’s publication records | 2024 (investigation conducted) | derived (fact-checking chain) | Schwabish, 2024 |
| 32 | A parallel 2012 investigation independently found no NSF record behind the same viral figure | 2012 (investigation conducted) | derived (fact-checking chain) | Neuroskeptic, 2012 |
| 33 | Closest real figure for negative thought content: 26.5% of mind-wandering moments carried unpleasant content, among 2,250 adults contacted through an iPhone app | 2010 | primary study | Killingsworth & Gilbert, 2010 |
Negative self-talk statistics: how common is it?
Common enough that researchers treat self-criticism as one of the ordinary categories of inner speech. Brinthaupt, Hein, and Kramer’s 2009 validation of the Self-Talk Scale found self-critical talk alongside self-reinforcing, self-managing, and social-assessing talk across five nonclinical adult samples, people never screened for any disorder (Brinthaupt, Hein, & Kramer, 2009). A 2015 follow-up found self-critical self-talk triggered in about 72 percent of situations built to prompt it, against 51 percent for self-reinforcing talk in the same situations (Brinthaupt, Benson, Kang, & Moore, 2015). The fuller trace, including the untraceable “80 percent of self-talk is negative, per APA” claim, lives on is negative self-talk normal.
What percentage of people have negative self-talk?
No study has produced that clean a percentage, and that gap is the honest answer. What exists instead is a situational trigger rate: 72 percent of moments engineered to prompt self-criticism actually produced it, in a small 35-adult sample (Brinthaupt, Benson, Kang, & Moore, 2015). That is a narrower measurement than “percentage of people,” and turning it into a population prevalence figure would strip the qualifier that makes it meaningful. Readers looking for what this pattern actually sounds like will get more from examples of negative self-talk than from a single number.
What causes negative self-talk?
Stress is the clearest documented driver. Among 1,071 race participants studied in the Basque Country, higher perceived stress predicted more frequent negative self-talk, weaker among people who scored higher on appraising their own emotions (Borrajo, Calvete, & Urquijo, 2024). Among undergraduates studied separately, dysfunctional self-talk tracked with lower academic satisfaction and self-efficacy (Uhrich et al., 2023). The pattern rises and falls with what triggers it, the territory why am I so hard on myself explores directly, and what loosens its grip is covered in overcoming self-criticism.
How common is perfectionism?
There is no population prevalence rate for perfectionism. Psychology measures it on a continuous scale, producing an average and a spread for whoever answers the questionnaire. What exists instead is 35 years of cohort data: across 307 samples and 82,939 college students surveyed 1989 to 2024, socially prescribed perfectionism, the belief that others demand perfection of you, rose overall (Curran, Hill, & Pose, 2026). An earlier cut of the same tradition, 164 samples and 41,641 students surveyed 1989 to 2016, found the average student moved from the 50th to the 66th percentile of the distribution, described as a 32 percent increase (Curran & Hill, 2019). The full tracing, including where the circulated “33 percent” figure diverges from the paper’s own 32 percent, lives on how common is perfectionism.
Can perfectionism be good? Maladaptive perfectionism statistics
Research splits perfectionists into groups, and the split matters more than a single prevalence number. Among 3,112 university students, 20.1 percent classified as adaptive perfectionists, 35.7 percent as maladaptive, and 44.3 percent as nonperfectionists on the Almost Perfect Scale-Revised, and the adaptive group reported significantly greater self-compassion than the maladaptive group (Kawamoto et al., 2023). The same drive toward high standards produces different outcomes depending on whether it pairs with self-compassion or harsh self-judgment, the ground what mindful self-compassion involves covers.
What causes extreme perfectionism?
Cohort research points to environment. Curran, Hill, and Pose’s 2026 analysis names rising GDP and income inequality as factors associated with the 35-year climb in socially prescribed perfectionism, the belief that people around you demand flawlessness, one of three dimensions the field measures alongside self-oriented and other-oriented perfectionism, first defined by Hewitt and Flett (1991) (Curran, Hill, & Pose, 2026). A climate that keeps raising the bar for “good enough” shapes the self-talk underneath it, explored further in signs of perfectionism.
How common is imposter syndrome?
Reported prevalence spans 9 percent to 82 percent, and that width is itself the finding. Bravata and colleagues pooled 62 studies covering 14,161 participants, literature searched January 1966 through May 2018, and found prevalence “varied widely from 9 to 82% largely depending on the screening tool and cutoff used” (Bravata et al., 2020). One 654-person Korean sample produced 24 percent at one Clance-scale cutoff and 39 percent at another, from identical answers, the clearest demonstration of how much the threshold decides the number. The full range lives on what percentage of people experience imposter syndrome.
Why is imposter syndrome so common?
Because the feeling attaches to achievement itself. Every sample behind the 9-to-82-percent range was recruited through a school, hospital, or workplace, spanning students, physicians, residents, managers, and teachers (Bravata et al., 2020), and Clance and Imes’s original 1978 description covered over 150 highly successful women, the population where the pattern was first named and studied closely (Clance & Imes, 1978). Reaching a level worth doubting is what puts someone in position to feel like a fraud, a dynamic why do I never feel good enough sits with directly.
Is imposter syndrome normal? Does everyone have it?
No study supports “everyone,” but measured rates run high wherever researchers have looked. Among 631 Austrian doctoral students, 82 percent registered at least low levels of imposter feelings, the highest figure in the reviewed range, while 9 percent of Vienna undergraduates scored in the “intense” band on the same kind of scale (Jöstl et al., 2012; Patzak et al., 2017). One counts anyone registering at all and the other counts only the severe tail. No representative national survey has measured the phenomenon in a general adult population.
How common is imposter syndrome at work?
Measured rates run high in the small workplace studies that exist. Among 48 internal medicine residents at one Canadian medical school, 43.8 percent scored as impostors on the Clance Impostor Scale, a narrow sample (Legassie, Zibrowski, & Goldszmidt, 2008). Bravata and colleagues’ review found imposter feelings associated with impaired job performance, job satisfaction, and burnout across clinicians and other employee groups, an association only, with no study establishing which factor arrives first (Bravata et al., 2020). Evidence on sex differences splits close to evenly: 16 of 62 reviewed studies found women’s rates significantly higher, 17 found none.
How common is low self-esteem?
No well-sourced study puts a clean percentage on it, despite how often one circulates. Population studies using the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale report group averages, a different kind of figure from an individual prevalence rate: a U.S. sample of 503 adults (fieldwork date not stated; 2010 is the confirmed publication year) averaged 22.62 out of 30, above the scale’s own low-esteem cutoff of 15 (Sinclair et al., 2010), and a 53-nation study found every national average above the scale’s theoretical midpoint (Schmitt & Allik, 2005). The full tracing, including the “85 percent have low self-esteem” claim and where it actually leads, lives on how common is low self-esteem.
Is the 95 percent negative thoughts statistic real?
No. Two checkable facts settle it. NSF has no published study behind the figure anywhere in its publication records, confirmed by direct inquiry to its publications office in 2024 and independently by a 2012 investigation (Schwabish, 2024; Neuroskeptic, 2012), and the closest real number for negative thought content is 26.5 percent of mind-wandering moments among 2,250 adults, well short of 95 percent (Killingsworth & Gilbert, 2010). The same missing-study pattern reappears in the “80 percent of self-talk is negative, per APA” and “85 percent of people have low self-esteem” figures on this page, each traced to an unnamed-research marketing source. The full trace lives on is the 95 percent negative thoughts statistic real.
Methodology
Statistics on this page were selected by starting from data/citation-ledger.md‘s existing verified sources for the inner-critic-self-compassion cluster, then reusing every number and citation already confirmed on the five live spoke pages this hub summarizes. Every primary study was confirmed against the publishing journal, DOI record, or an indexed full-text copy already verified for its originating spoke page. The circulated but untraceable figures (the APA 80 percent self-talk claim, the 85 percent low-esteem claim, the 70 percent imposter-syndrome claim, the 95 percent negative-thoughts claim) were each traced to their earliest identifiable public source, and every missing sampling or dating detail is disclosed as missing in the text. Sources last verified 2026-09-12.
Cite this page
APA: Eduard, S. (2026, September 12). Negative self-talk statistics: Self-criticism, perfectionism, and imposter syndrome by the numbers. StumbleTowardTheLight. https://stumbletowardthelight.com/negative-self-talk-statistics/
MLA: Eduard, Sebastian. “Negative Self-Talk Statistics: Self-Criticism, Perfectionism, and Imposter Syndrome by the Numbers.” StumbleTowardTheLight, 12 Sept. 2026, stumbletowardthelight.com/negative-self-talk-statistics/.
Frequently asked questions
Is negative self-talk a real, measurable thing?
Yes. Brinthaupt’s Self-Talk Scale research identifies self-criticism as one of four regular self-talk categories, present across nonclinical adult samples, though no study has produced a defensible percentage of how much of anyone’s self-talk is negative (Brinthaupt, Hein, & Kramer, 2009).
Is perfectionism the same thing as having high standards?
Research measures it as a continuous trait with three dimensions: standards for yourself, standards you believe others hold for you, and standards you hold for other people (Hewitt & Flett, 1991). Which dimension dominates separates the 20.1 percent of one university sample classified as adaptive perfectionists from the 35.7 percent classified as maladaptive (Kawamoto et al., 2023).
What percentage of people have imposter syndrome?
Between 9 and 82 percent, depending on the screening tool and cutoff a study used, across 62 studies and 14,161 participants (Bravata et al., 2020). No nationally representative survey has measured it in a general adult population.
Is the “70 percent of people have imposter syndrome” statistic accurate?
Its citation trail runs from a 2011 journal review to a 2007 trade newspaper feature whose catalogue record dates the underlying research to the mid-1980s and applies the finding to careers (Gravois, 2007). The record does not describe a lifetime rate.
Is low self-esteem common?
No representative study puts a specific prevalence rate on it. Group averages using the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale run above the scale’s own midpoint in every nation studied, including a U.S. sample (fieldwork date not stated; 2010 is the confirmed publication year) averaging 22.62 out of 30 against a low-esteem cutoff of 15 (Sinclair et al., 2010).
Where did the “80 percent of self-talk is negative” and “95 percent of thoughts are negative” statistics come from?
Neither traces to a real study. Both circulate under a swapped attribution, sometimes credited to the American Psychological Association and sometimes to the National Science Foundation, and neither organization has published a matching study (Schwabish, 2024).
Does self-criticism mean something is psychologically wrong?
Not by itself. Self-critical self-talk rises with situational stress and eases as people score higher on appraising their own emotions (Borrajo, Calvete, & Urquijo, 2024).
Related reading
- Overcoming Self-Criticism
- How Common Is Perfectionism?
- What Percentage of People Experience Imposter Syndrome?
- How Common Is Low Self-Esteem?
- Is the 95 Percent Negative Thoughts Statistic Real?
- Is Negative Self-Talk Normal?
References
American Psychological Association. (n.d.). Stress in America. Retrieved August 2, 2026.
Bleidorn, W., Arslan, R. C., Denissen, J. J. A., Rentfrow, P. J., Gebauer, J. E., Potter, J., & Gosling, S. D. (2016). Age and gender differences in self-esteem: A cross-cultural window. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(3), 396-410.
Borrajo, E., Calvete, E., & Urquijo, I. (2024). Negative self-talk in runners: Emotional intelligence and perceived stress as explanatory factors. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 70, Article 102545.
Bravata, D. M., Watts, S. A., Keefer, A. L., Madhusudhan, D. K., Taylor, K. T., Clark, D. M., Nelson, R. S., Cokley, K. O., & Hagg, H. K. (2020). Prevalence, predictors, and treatment of impostor syndrome: A systematic review. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 35(4), 1252-1275.
Brinthaupt, T. M., Benson, S. A., Kang, M., & Moore, Z. D. (2015). Assessing the accuracy of self-reported self-talk. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 570.
Brinthaupt, T. M., Hein, M. B., & Kramer, T. E. (2009). The Self-Talk Scale: Development, factor analysis, and validation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(1), 82-92.
Chae, J. H., Piedmont, R. L., Estadt, B. K., & Wicks, R. J. (1995). Personological evaluation of Clance’s Impostor Phenomenon Scale in a Korean sample. Journal of Personality Assessment, 65(3), 468-485.
Clance, P. R., & Imes, S. A. (1978). The imposter phenomenon in high achieving women: Dynamics and therapeutic intervention. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 15(3), 241-247.
Curran, T., & Hill, A. P. (2019). Perfectionism is increasing over time: A meta-analysis of birth cohort differences from 1989 to 2016. Psychological Bulletin, 145(4), 410-429.
Curran, T., Hill, A. P., & Pose, P. M. (2026). Perfectionism is accelerating over time: A cross-temporal meta-analytic review of 35 years of college student data. Psychological Bulletin, 152(3), 255-287.
Gravois, J. (2007, November 9). You’re not fooling anyone. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 54(11), A1.
Hewitt, P. L., & Flett, G. L. (1991). Perfectionism in the self and social contexts: Conceptualization, assessment, and association with psychopathology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(3), 456-470.
Jöstl, G., Bergsmann, E., Lüftenegger, M., Schober, B., & Spiel, C. (2012). When will they blow my cover? The impostor phenomenon among Austrian doctoral students. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 220(2), 109-120.
Kawamoto, A., Sheth, R., Yang, M., Demps, L., & Sevig, T. (2023). The role of self-compassion among adaptive and maladaptive perfectionists in university students. The Counseling Psychologist, 51(1), 113-144.
Killingsworth, M. A., & Gilbert, D. T. (2010). A wandering mind is an unhappy mind. Science, 330(6006), 932.
Latinjak, A. T., Morin, A., Brinthaupt, T. M., Hardy, J., Hatzigeorgiadis, A., Kendall, P. C., Neck, C., Oliver, E. J., Puchalska-Wasyl, M. M., Tovares, A. V., & Winsler, A. (2023). Self-talk: An interdisciplinary review and transdisciplinary model. Review of General Psychology, 27(4), 355-386.
Legassie, J., Zibrowski, E. M., & Goldszmidt, M. A. (2008). Measuring resident well-being: Impostorism and burnout syndrome in residency. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 23(7), 1090-1094.
Neuroskeptic. (2012, May 9). The 70,000 thoughts per day myth? Discover Magazine.
Patzak, A., Kollmayer, M., & Schober, B. (2017). Buffering impostor feelings with kindness: The mediating role of self-compassion between gender-role orientation and the impostor phenomenon. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1289.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton University Press.
Rubino, J. (2006). The self-esteem book: The ultimate guide to boost the most underrated ingredient for success and happiness in life. Vision Works Publishing.
Sakulku, J., & Alexander, J. (2011). The impostor phenomenon. International Journal of Behavioral Science, 6(1), 73-92.
Sand, L., Boe, T., Shafran, R., Stormark, K. M., & Hysing, M. (2021). Perfectionism in adolescence: Associations with gender, age, and socioeconomic status in a Norwegian sample. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 688811.
Schmitt, D. P., & Allik, J. (2005). Simultaneous administration of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in 53 nations: Exploring the universal and culture-specific features of global self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(4), 623-642.
Schwabish, J. (2024, October 16). Fact-checking 60,000 thoughts: The mystery behind a misleading statistic. PolicyViz.
Sinclair, S. J., Blais, M. A., Gansler, D. A., Sandberg, E., Bistis, K., & LoCicero, A. (2010). Psychometric properties of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: Overall and across demographic groups living within the United States. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 33(1), 56-80.
Uhrich, B. B., Rogelberg, S. L., Rogelberg, S. G., Kello, J. E., Williams, E. B., Gur, S. S., Caudill, L. E., & Moffit, M. (2023). The power of the inner voice: Examining self-talk’s relationship with academic outcomes. American Journal of Education, 130(1), 31-60.